Slammed Mornington Peninsula Freeway Project relevant for the proposed NE Link

The Peninsula Link Freeway is a case study for the proposed NE Link (picture source: The Age, Justin McManus)

The Victorian Auditor General has slammed decisions by the former Victorian Labor government to proceed with major roads projects. He raised especially serious questions about the Peninsula Link freeway which is currently under construction between Carrum Downs and Dromana. In common with much of outer suburban Melbourne this area is chronically short of good quality public transport services.

The project will cost Victorian taxpayers about $2 billion over its full life as a public private partnership (PPP) and has precipitated considerable environmental degradation along its path.

Heritage listed bushland as Westerfield, Frankston South before the bulldozers moved in for the Peninsula Link

The same spot in Spring 2010 after the bulldozers moved in to start construction on the Peninsula Link Freeway

In particular, The Linking Melbourne Authority, which is responsible for developing the Peninsula Link project and is now overseeing its delivery, was found to have not adequately informed decision-makers about whether the Peninsula Link project should proceed. The estimate of the economic benefits of the project were found to be unreliable.

The Auditor General’s report, Management of Major Road Projects, which was tabled in the Victorian Parliament on 1 June 2011 can be read in full, together with the audit summary, at

Slapdash roads spending

The audit report reveals again the slapdash way that public money was committed to major road projects without adequate evaluation. Writing in The Age on 2 June, Clay Lucas and Royce Millar (“Auditor hits $2b road project”)  reported that the government was determined to proceed with the project come what may. A senior transport authority figure was quoted as saying  that with Peninsula Link ex-premier John Brumby needed a ”shovel-ready” project to stimulate the economy and to show a PPP could be delivered in a difficult climate.

”It was justified on the basis of his political needs and the GFC. It was never justified on a needs basis, and that’s shown by the fact it could never have worked as a toll road, because the demand wasn’t there.”

The article by Clay Lucas and Royce Millar can be seen at:

Relevance for the proposed North East Link

The episode raises serious questions about how major road projects are considered at state government level. In the absence of any open public and expert inquiry processes both Peninsula Link and the North East Link freeway projects were included in the Brumby government’s December 2008 Victorian Transport Plan.

Whilst the Baillieu government says that it is not committed to the North East Link project, it has permitted VicRoads to conclude an in-house bureaucratic evaluation process commenced by the Brumby government. It is now all but been finalised. The government has not ruled out building the North East Link.

The fact is that the North East Link project does not make any more sense for north east Melbourne than Peninsula Link made for south east Melbourne. The government should put a line through it in favour of a comprehensive program for public transport.

Read related comments in The Age below:

3 June 2011

4 June 2011


About Friends of Banyule Inc

President & Public Officer of Friends of Banyule Inc, a community not- for-profit organisation to enhance and protect the environmental assets of Banyule City. Currently fighting the proposed NE Link freeway through one of inner Melbourne's most ecologically sensitive areas and historical areas.
This entry was posted in Banyule Flats, Car Dependency, Investment in Rail, Ne-Link Freeway, Public Transport, Trains, Uncategorized, Vic Roads and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Slammed Mornington Peninsula Freeway Project relevant for the proposed NE Link

  1. Millicent says:

    Those of Friends of Banyule who think that being “nice” and diplomatic to stop the loss of heritage and parklands in Banyule will eventually stop it are wrong! Many people protested against the Peninsula Link for its biodiversity value and for endangered species. It was violated for nought – basically greed for growth! Any conservation efforts are so easily just obliterated by an insane approval from the State “planning” department. Ultimately, police on horseback came in to “protect” the final protesters, mainly mature people who wanted to secure the habitat, and the bulldozers came in. People who generally love Australia are saddened to so the horrific and downward changes happening to human and environmental justice and welfare.

    • Hi Milly – Thanks for your comments. I don’t quite get what would make you think that Friends of Banyule are nice and diplomatic? I am quite aware of what happened at the Peninsula Link picket line. In fact we were there to support the group. Let me know your thoughts. Cheers Marion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s